<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Deeper Waters</title>
	<atom:link href="http://deeperwaters.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://deeperwaters.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Diving into the ocean of truth.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 09:17:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on The Father Is Greater Than I? by Steve S</title>
		<link>http://deeperwaters.wordpress.com/2009/06/14/the-father-is-greater-than-i/#comment-1577</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 09:17:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deeperwaters.wordpress.com/?p=1354#comment-1577</guid>
		<description>One more thing. Isn&#039;t it wonderful to have someone stand in the gap for us for our sin? There is no other way to the Father but through the Son.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One more thing. Isn&#8217;t it wonderful to have someone stand in the gap for us for our sin? There is no other way to the Father but through the Son.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Father Is Greater Than I? by Steve S</title>
		<link>http://deeperwaters.wordpress.com/2009/06/14/the-father-is-greater-than-i/#comment-1576</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 09:16:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deeperwaters.wordpress.com/?p=1354#comment-1576</guid>
		<description>I read it as I see it. The Father or His Father. People go around circles with this. Another one is &quot;If you have seen me you have seen the Father. I believe that Christ is God in man in the flesh. There could be no other way for man to be reconciled but through perfection.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read it as I see it. The Father or His Father. People go around circles with this. Another one is &#8220;If you have seen me you have seen the Father. I believe that Christ is God in man in the flesh. There could be no other way for man to be reconciled but through perfection.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Body Prepared by Mr Minder</title>
		<link>http://deeperwaters.wordpress.com/2009/11/17/a-body-prepared/#comment-1575</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr Minder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 17:44:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deeperwaters.wordpress.com/?p=1692#comment-1575</guid>
		<description>It really is important to note that Christ&#039;s body died, but that he (in his divine nature) continued to live - and that his body was raised and glorified. It&#039;s not always easy to understand, but it is essential to our faith. 

I will pray for you and your grandmother, Nick. Though may I ask, is it your grandmother on your mother&#039;s or on your father&#039;s side?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It really is important to note that Christ&#8217;s body died, but that he (in his divine nature) continued to live &#8211; and that his body was raised and glorified. It&#8217;s not always easy to understand, but it is essential to our faith. </p>
<p>I will pray for you and your grandmother, Nick. Though may I ask, is it your grandmother on your mother&#8217;s or on your father&#8217;s side?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Tribute To The Curtmudgeon by Allie</title>
		<link>http://deeperwaters.wordpress.com/2009/10/30/a-tribute-to-the-curtmudgeon/#comment-1572</link>
		<dc:creator>Allie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 02:13:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deeperwaters.wordpress.com/?p=1653#comment-1572</guid>
		<description>Very good Nick, his family and friends are in my prayers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very good Nick, his family and friends are in my prayers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What Men Go Through, The Struggle of Sex by Zlata</title>
		<link>http://deeperwaters.wordpress.com/2008/01/10/what-men-go-through-the-struggle-of-sex/#comment-1571</link>
		<dc:creator>Zlata</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 04:33:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deeperwaters.wordpress.com/2008/01/10/what-men-go-through-the-struggle-of-sex/#comment-1571</guid>
		<description>I have to say - this was quite the interesting read.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to say &#8211; this was quite the interesting read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Tribute To The Curtmudgeon by MichelleMu</title>
		<link>http://deeperwaters.wordpress.com/2009/10/30/a-tribute-to-the-curtmudgeon/#comment-1570</link>
		<dc:creator>MichelleMu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 19:35:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deeperwaters.wordpress.com/?p=1653#comment-1570</guid>
		<description>Well said, Nick. Thanks for saying it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said, Nick. Thanks for saying it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Little Lower Than Angels by paradoxicak</title>
		<link>http://deeperwaters.wordpress.com/2009/10/29/a-little-lower-than-angels/#comment-1569</link>
		<dc:creator>paradoxicak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 16:16:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deeperwaters.wordpress.com/?p=1650#comment-1569</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know any of the people you mentioned. People such as you apparently thought I did, and that I was one of these former people that made a re-entry under this name. I don&#039;t even know what a sock puppet is. Of no matter, however. You can find me on the CARM boards, which does not get rid of people because some christian such as yourself can&#039;t defeat their arguments. I had decided not to post anymore on TWEB, anyway, as the people there are stark raving mad; not unlike your post. Many of the people over at the other debate board can string together reasoned debates. You might try it sometimes, along with Apolobalognia. No more posting here by me. Neither one of you are worth any more of my valuable time. You&#039;re both loonies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know any of the people you mentioned. People such as you apparently thought I did, and that I was one of these former people that made a re-entry under this name. I don&#8217;t even know what a sock puppet is. Of no matter, however. You can find me on the CARM boards, which does not get rid of people because some christian such as yourself can&#8217;t defeat their arguments. I had decided not to post anymore on TWEB, anyway, as the people there are stark raving mad; not unlike your post. Many of the people over at the other debate board can string together reasoned debates. You might try it sometimes, along with Apolobalognia. No more posting here by me. Neither one of you are worth any more of my valuable time. You&#8217;re both loonies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Tribute To The Curtmudgeon by Mr Minder</title>
		<link>http://deeperwaters.wordpress.com/2009/10/30/a-tribute-to-the-curtmudgeon/#comment-1568</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr Minder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 14:43:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deeperwaters.wordpress.com/?p=1653#comment-1568</guid>
		<description>I was saddened to hear that Curt is gone now. I fine tribute to a fine man, Nick.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was saddened to hear that Curt is gone now. I fine tribute to a fine man, Nick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Tribute To The Curtmudgeon by RTT</title>
		<link>http://deeperwaters.wordpress.com/2009/10/30/a-tribute-to-the-curtmudgeon/#comment-1567</link>
		<dc:creator>RTT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 04:41:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deeperwaters.wordpress.com/?p=1653#comment-1567</guid>
		<description>Wonderful tribute Nick</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wonderful tribute Nick</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Little Lower Than Angels by Rational Gaze</title>
		<link>http://deeperwaters.wordpress.com/2009/10/29/a-little-lower-than-angels/#comment-1566</link>
		<dc:creator>Rational Gaze</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 02:27:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deeperwaters.wordpress.com/?p=1650#comment-1566</guid>
		<description>Lies lies from tiny eyes. You can deny being a sockpuppet all you want. You might also want to stop stealing argument from Yo Lunch if you want to prevent your ever dwindling credibility from sinking further. You and others like you (yo lunch, hooks, tassman, jimbo, et al.) are frequently flattened, yet, much like Monty Python&#039;s Black Knight deny such occurences and instead invent all manner of illogical, psychotic, quixotic concoctions rather than admit you are beaten and have a penchant for projecting their own negative attributes onto others. A sure sign of narcissistic, paranoid and antisocial personality disorders as well as psychopathy/sociopathy. If TheologyWeb is a forum where Christianity remains &quot;unchallenged&quot; why then, are their so many atheists there and why have they all not been banned? CodewordConduit, EvoUK, Jaecp, Chrs, Dpug Shaver et al. are all still members there last time I checked. Then again, the overwhelming majority of atheists on TWeb are courteous, polite and have the decency not to breakdown mentally when they are bested or to explode when someone makes them feel smaller than the ankle-socks of a particularly small beetle, standing in a ditch, in a quarry, in the low country. They also don&#039;t uneccessarily antagonise, insult or belittle people and actually present arguments and debate in a rational and mature manner. Why is there not one, but two apologetics boards? (Apologetics 301 and (General Theistics 101 aka Apologetics Lite)) Why is there a whole section dedicated for the purpose of debating (The Gym). Why is there specific boards for non-theists and non-Christians? (Naturalism 101, Islam, Judaism, LDS - Mormonism, JW - Watchtower Society and Wiccan &#124; Neo-pagan Religions) Why are there two board for discussing Heterodox and non-Christian beliefs? (Unorthodox Theology 101 and Comparative Religions 101) You would do well to step out of the delusional bubble you have been living in, before it implodes under the pressure of reality. You may believe that serious, well-thought out, logically coherent philosophical arguments that make perfect rational sense and mountains of physical evidence supporting the thesis that Christianity is true to be silly, but in the real world, hand-waving does not count as a substantive, detailed and thorough rebuttal. I didn&#039;t appreciate your &#039;humour&#039;, becuase I have not seen any (although I have only read one or two of your posts). If your sense of humour is as terrible as your critical thinking skills, then I would imagine it would be awful indeed. We shall keep &#039;flinging the insults&#039; (although, a more accurate statement would be &#039;keep presenting the truth&#039;), not becuase we &quot;can&#039;t defeat the message&quot; (I have no idea what your &quot;message&quot; is, unless you call stalking ApologiaPhoenix a message?), but because you are boring, irreverant and so unremittingly stupid that it strains credulity granting you the credence to be entertained, let alone replied to. I have starry eyed followers here? That&#039;s news to me. Not just that I have &quot;starry-eyed followers&quot; (wherever they may be, I suspect they exist in the same realm as your purple bunny) but that I would have any here, seeing as this is ApologiaPhoenix&#039;s blog, not mine. Yes, I know the truth, however, I am fairly certain that you would not know what any truth was, let alone the truth regarding this matter, which is, you are deluded grade a whackamole who is so arsesore and butthurt for being banned, not once, but twice that you feel the need to stalk the people who were instrumental in your repeated downfalls. You were banned becuase you were an idiot who refused to obey the rules of TWeb and becuase you are sockpuppet, so that means you have racked enough infractions to be banned twice. I find it odd how you claim I can&#039;t debate properly considering, I have never debated nor participated in a discussion with you and when offered the chance to debate someone in the Wrestling Ring, you chickened. This is also highly ironic, in the sense that, you could not debate properly even if your life depended on it. The only person you make look silly, is yourself. Take off the tin-foil hat, quit smoking marijuana, learn how to apply the laws of logic correctly and get an education.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lies lies from tiny eyes. You can deny being a sockpuppet all you want. You might also want to stop stealing argument from Yo Lunch if you want to prevent your ever dwindling credibility from sinking further. You and others like you (yo lunch, hooks, tassman, jimbo, et al.) are frequently flattened, yet, much like Monty Python&#8217;s Black Knight deny such occurences and instead invent all manner of illogical, psychotic, quixotic concoctions rather than admit you are beaten and have a penchant for projecting their own negative attributes onto others. A sure sign of narcissistic, paranoid and antisocial personality disorders as well as psychopathy/sociopathy. If TheologyWeb is a forum where Christianity remains &#8220;unchallenged&#8221; why then, are their so many atheists there and why have they all not been banned? CodewordConduit, EvoUK, Jaecp, Chrs, Dpug Shaver et al. are all still members there last time I checked. Then again, the overwhelming majority of atheists on TWeb are courteous, polite and have the decency not to breakdown mentally when they are bested or to explode when someone makes them feel smaller than the ankle-socks of a particularly small beetle, standing in a ditch, in a quarry, in the low country. They also don&#8217;t uneccessarily antagonise, insult or belittle people and actually present arguments and debate in a rational and mature manner. Why is there not one, but two apologetics boards? (Apologetics 301 and (General Theistics 101 aka Apologetics Lite)) Why is there a whole section dedicated for the purpose of debating (The Gym). Why is there specific boards for non-theists and non-Christians? (Naturalism 101, Islam, Judaism, LDS &#8211; Mormonism, JW &#8211; Watchtower Society and Wiccan | Neo-pagan Religions) Why are there two board for discussing Heterodox and non-Christian beliefs? (Unorthodox Theology 101 and Comparative Religions 101) You would do well to step out of the delusional bubble you have been living in, before it implodes under the pressure of reality. You may believe that serious, well-thought out, logically coherent philosophical arguments that make perfect rational sense and mountains of physical evidence supporting the thesis that Christianity is true to be silly, but in the real world, hand-waving does not count as a substantive, detailed and thorough rebuttal. I didn&#8217;t appreciate your &#8216;humour&#8217;, becuase I have not seen any (although I have only read one or two of your posts). If your sense of humour is as terrible as your critical thinking skills, then I would imagine it would be awful indeed. We shall keep &#8216;flinging the insults&#8217; (although, a more accurate statement would be &#8216;keep presenting the truth&#8217;), not becuase we &#8220;can&#8217;t defeat the message&#8221; (I have no idea what your &#8220;message&#8221; is, unless you call stalking ApologiaPhoenix a message?), but because you are boring, irreverant and so unremittingly stupid that it strains credulity granting you the credence to be entertained, let alone replied to. I have starry eyed followers here? That&#8217;s news to me. Not just that I have &#8220;starry-eyed followers&#8221; (wherever they may be, I suspect they exist in the same realm as your purple bunny) but that I would have any here, seeing as this is ApologiaPhoenix&#8217;s blog, not mine. Yes, I know the truth, however, I am fairly certain that you would not know what any truth was, let alone the truth regarding this matter, which is, you are deluded grade a whackamole who is so arsesore and butthurt for being banned, not once, but twice that you feel the need to stalk the people who were instrumental in your repeated downfalls. You were banned becuase you were an idiot who refused to obey the rules of TWeb and becuase you are sockpuppet, so that means you have racked enough infractions to be banned twice. I find it odd how you claim I can&#8217;t debate properly considering, I have never debated nor participated in a discussion with you and when offered the chance to debate someone in the Wrestling Ring, you chickened. This is also highly ironic, in the sense that, you could not debate properly even if your life depended on it. The only person you make look silly, is yourself. Take off the tin-foil hat, quit smoking marijuana, learn how to apply the laws of logic correctly and get an education.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
